Source article

That’s over 30 edits per day, seven days a week. And I do not use that figuratively: Wikipedia edits are timed, and if you plot them, the timecard for “Philip Cross’s” Wikipedia activity is astonishing is astonishing if it is one individual

https://kek.gg/i/7Px5Sd.pngPNG

the purpose of the “Philip Cross” operation is systematically to attack and undermine the reputations of those who are prominent in challenging the dominant corporate and state media narrative. particularly in foreign affairs. “Philip Cross” also systematically seeks to burnish the reputations of mainstream media journalists and other figures who are particularly prominent in pushing neo-con propaganda and in promoting the interests of Israel.

What is particularly interesting is that “Philip Cross”‘s views happen to be precisely the same political views as those of Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia. Jimmy Wales has been on twitter the last few daysPNG being actively rude and unpleasant to anybody questioning the activities of Philip Cross. His commitment to Cross’s freedom to operate on Wikipedia would be rather more impressive if the Cross operation were not promoting Wales’ own opinions. Jimmy Wales has actively spoken against Jeremy Corbyn, supports the bombing of Syria, supports Israel, is so much of a Blairite he married Blair’s secretary, and sits on the board of Guardian Media Group Ltd alongside Katherine Viner.

The extreme defensiveness and surliness of Wales’ twitter responses on the “Philip Cross” operation is very revealing. Why do you think he reacts like this? Interestingly enough. Wikipedia’s UK begging arm, Wikimedia UK, joined in with equal hostile responses to anyone questioning Cross.

Wikimedia had arrived uninvited into a twitter thread discussing the “Philip Cross” operation and had immediately started attacking peoplePNGquestioning Cross’s legitimacy. Basically openly datamining their opposition.

Just look at every single fucking plant on wikipedia. They actively censor out constituent lists and put in disinfo to protect the income of the pharmakikes. From the consistency of the edits, it is very obvious that "Philip Cross" is a (presumably state-level) group. From the response of Wales, it is obvious they are connected. Ergo, Wikipedia is totally compromised. (May still be news to some.)

Somebody already tattledPNG Here's the admin noticeboard post in question.PNG

Here's their donor list. Arcadia is Rothschild. Erasmus is Blackrock through Robert Torretti. Don't know about the others. Have fun digging into it if you want.

Wikipedia also shreds their logsPNG

George Galloway has offered a reward of £1,000 for the name and address of “Cross” so he may also take legal action.

http://archive.li/cwy8a

Happy Hunting.